Bapa anti hadis Malaysia,,yang menimbulkan kontroversi.., menubuhkan JAM,, Jemaah Alquran Malaysia... , Majlis Fatwa pernah keluar fatwa yang kumpulan iini haram,, tetapi tiada tindakan dari pihak penguatkuasa,,,, kenapa... sebab mangkok ni Ketua UMNO satu cawangan di Pulau Pinang satu ketika dulu...
Tetapi dalam teruk-teruk mangkok anti hadis ni pun, bila mai Najib jadi PM,, ia pun tak tahan juga rupanya..... agaknya jiwa sosialis masih ada dalam tubuh badannya....
Ia pun boleh komen baguih punya kat Najib... baca KLIK SINI
kalau diteliti betul2 dia ni 2 x 5 ngan mahathir. usahlah duk jadikan rujukan pandangan depa ni, hentikanlah. macam nak bagi kredit kat dia pulak...
ReplyDeletememang la mm ni jenih suka cari kesempatan..apapun yang boleh buat modal sokong dia,dia ambik.sampai tokeh anti hadis sesat.jenih jah pun dia ambik dalil .jenih jahil murakab bengong...
ReplyDeleteaku stuju ngan hussin...inilah sebenarnya yang namanya manjung mari ...manusia tua bangka yang bertopengkan perjuangan islam konon...rujukannya tokoh sesat anti hadis ..sesat lagi menyesatkan.aku seru kat hampa suma..hampa kenal sikit mm ni.dia ni fahaman sesat pas ..hampa jangan dok sokong dia..dia lah perosak pas sebenarnya.blognya yang penuh dengan maki hamun..itulah sikap dan gaya hidup dia dari makan gaji sampai pencen...Takbir..
ReplyDeleteSAYA SETUJU....TOBATLAH WAHAI MANJUNG MARI..BANYAKKAN MUHASABAH...JANGAN TERTIPU DENGAN SIKAP YANG SUKA MEMAKI HAMUN ORANG LAIN.
ReplyDeleteوَمِنَ النَّاسِ مَن يَشْتَرِي لَهْوَ الْحَدِيثِ لِيُضِلَّ عَن سَبِيلِ اللَّهِ بِغَيْرِ عِلْمٍ وَيَتَّخِذَهَا هُزُوًا ۚ أُولَٰئِكَ لَهُمْ عَذَابٌ مُّهِينٌ
ReplyDelete"But there are among men those who patronize RIDICULOUS HADITHS (لَهْوَ الْحَدِيثِ) without knowledge (thereby) misleading from the Path of Allah and throwing a butt of mockery: for such there will be a humiliating Penalty" (Sura Luqman:6)
PROPHET ORDERED DRINK OF CAMEL'S URINE?
YOU ARE DISGUSTING AND GOING TO HELL FOR DEFAMING OUR BELOVED PROPHET!!
By Abu Qilaba : Anas said, "Some people of 'Ukl or 'Uraina tribe came to Medina and its climate did not suit them. So the Prophet ordered them to go to the herd of (Milch) camels and to DRINK THEIR milk and URINE (as a medicine). So they went AS DIRECTED and after they became healthy, they killed the shepherd of the Prophet and drove away all the camels. The news reached the Prophet early in the morning and he sent (men) in their pursuit and they were captured and brought at noon. HE (PROPHET) THEN ORDERED TO CUT THEIR HANDS AND FEET (AND IT WAS DONE), AND THEIR EYES WERE BRANDED WITH HEATED PIECES OF IRON, THEY WERE PUT IN 'AL-HARRA' AND WHEN THEY ASKED FOR WATER, NO WATER WAS GIVEN TO THEM." Abu Qilaba said, "Those people committed theft and murder, became infidels after embracing Islam and fought against Allah and His Apostle."; Sahih Bukhari Volume 001, Book 004, Hadith No. 234
Is this what you called authentic?
One must ask WHOSE AUTHENTICITY is in question here?
The "PROPHET" or the "PERSIAN HADITH COMPILERS"?
Upon which verses rests your FAITH or Imaan?
The "AL-QURAN" or "AL-BUKHARI & OTHER PERSIAN SCHOLARS"?
OPEN YOUR EYES AND SEE WHAT THE KUFR DID TO OUR PROPHETS!!
The hadith is the virus to change the Quran, and divided the Muslim Ummah!
PROPHET LEAVE US THE HADITH?
Narrated By 'Abdul 'Aziz bin Rufai' : Shaddad bin Ma'qil and I entered upon Ibn 'Abbas. Shaddad bin Ma'qil asked him, "Did the Prophet leave anything (besides the Qur'an)?" He replied. "He did not leave anything except what is Between the two bindings (of the Qur'an)." Then we visited Muhammad bin Al-Hanafiyya and asked him (the same question). He replied, "The Prophet did not leave except what is between the bindings (of the Qur'an)."; Sahih Bukhari Volume 006, Book 061, Hadith No. 537.
A Study of the Qur’an, Brother Mohammed Abdul Malik:
To understand the background to the development of Hadith literature one must sift through the history of Islam from about 250 years after the time of our Prophet… during the first century of the Prophet's era no hadiths were written down… Stories circulated by word of mouth but they were never written down ... some 250 years after the fact, Bukhari supposedly managed to trace back to its source (i.e. the Prophet) by establishing all the links in a chain which cannot possibly have been genuinely reconstructed! How he (Bukhari) managed to do this without written records, bridging a gap of about eight generations, and simultaneously establishing not only biographical data but also a compelling analysis of the mental faculties of his subjects defies belief! One can quote several hundred hadiths that not only contradict the Qur’an but also clearly do damage to the Prophet's good name.
Conspiracies against the Quran
http://www.free-minds.org/sites/default/files/Conspiracies.pdf
http://www.sahih-bukhari.com/Pages/Bukhari_8_82.php